That is all because of context. Bumrah’s first three overs went for a mere five runs, and included the wickets of Eoin Morgan and Andre Russell. His last over went for 27, but by then the match was already in the bag, and those runs conceded didn’t count for much. According to Smart Stats, his 32 runs conceded converted into only 24.8 Smart Runs, indicating he did very well when the pressure was relatively high. Rohit Sharma was named Man of the Match for his 54-ball 80, but in terms of impact he was marginally behind Bumrah.So does that mean the actual leaders in Smart Runs and Smart Wickets in earlier IPL seasons could be different from the Orange Cap and Purple Cap holders?
Yes, it does. According to Smart Numbers, David Warner had a slightly higher Smart Runs aggregate than Virat Kohli in 2016, despite Kohli’s aggregate of 973, which was 125 more than Warner’s 848. Similarly, in five of the last seven seasons, the bowler who took the Purple Cap wasn’t the leader in terms of Smart Wickets.Girish TS/ESPNcricinfo LtdCan we select the Man of the Match from Smart Stats?
Yes, we can. The Smart Contribution numbers from each game basically splits the contributions from each team within a total score of 100. That gives the top performers from each team, which can be used to nominate the Man of the Match.

About the Author

+300
+500
+1200
+1500
+750
$
JOIN NOW
Buddy Bonus
Sports Free Bets
Bonus